Consulting Is Not Dying. The Junior Consultant Is.
Author: Protik Ganguly
The story being told about AI and consulting is too simple. The simple version: AI will replace consultants, McKinsey is next, the industry is doomed. The accurate version is more precise, more interesting, and more useful to anyone whose career touches this world.
McKinsey shrank from 45,000 employees in 2022 to 36,000 today — already 25% below its historical peak — with a further 10% reduction in non-client roles signalled for the next two years. Accenture cut 11,000 roles while simultaneously committing $3 billion to AI and pledging 80,000 AI-focused hires. KPMG slashed entry-level hiring by 29%, Deloitte by 18%, EY by 11% (Plus AI, 2026). These are not the numbers of an industry being destroyed. They are the numbers of an industry being restructured — from the bottom up.
The entry level is where the structural shift is clearest. McKinsey deployed thousands of internal AI agents to automate work once handled by junior consultants — research, data gathering, first-pass slide decks. McKinsey's own research found AI shaves more than 30% off the time it takes to do research and synthesis on a typical project. When a tool reduces research time by 30%, a partner's calculation becomes inevitable: why hire ten analysts when three plus an AI deliver the same result faster?
What AI cannot do is what makes senior consulting valuable. The client relationship built over a decade. The boardroom read that tells you the CEO needs to hear a different version of the same finding. The judgment call on which insight to present and which to withhold. The ability to manage change in an organisation that rationally knows what to do but structurally resists doing it. These are not tasks. They are capacities developed over years of consequential work — precisely the kind of work that the entry-level pipeline used to build.
This is the hidden cost. The junior roles being eliminated were not just cheap labour. They were the training ground for the senior judgment that clients actually pay for. LinkedIn's 2026 Economic Graph found that 25% of entry-level consulting postings now require AI skills — the clearest signal that the role isn't disappearing, it is transforming. But transformed into what, and trained by whom, are questions the firms cutting their pipelines have not yet answered.
Eliminating the entry-level pipeline while preserving the senior layer works for one cycle. Over a decade, it produces a generation of senior consultants with no successors. The consulting firms that thrive will be those that redesign the training pipeline before the gap becomes a cliff. The ones that simply cut and hope are making the Kodak decision — in slower motion.
References
LinkedIn Economic Graph. (2026). 2026 jobs on the rise report. https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/research/jobs-on-the-rise
Medium / Carreras, R. (2026, January 14). What the layoffs at McKinsey teach us about the end of traditional consulting. https://medium.com/@roberto_carreras/what-the-layoffs-at-mckinsey-teach-us-about-the-end-of-traditional-consulting-6ca5c4ac6a12
Plus AI. (2026). How the top consulting firms are using AI. https://plusai.com/blog/how-consulting-firms-use-ai
The Briefs. (2026, May 21). McKinsey, PwC and EY cut executive assistants as AI scales. https://www.briefs.co/news/the-big-consulting-firms-just-started-cutting-executive-assistants-because-of-ai/
Related Articles
Embrace the Uncomfortable — The Case for Walking the Walk
• The gap in productivity, income, and relevance between early adopters and late adopters of transformative technologies tends to widen faster than expected and close slower than hoped. • Companies that built strategies around early versions of the internet, smartphones, and cloud computing captured disproportionate value, while those who waited found the territory already claimed. • Early adopters of AI tools are reportedly experiencing productivity gains of 20 to 40% on drafting, research, and analysis tasks, with companies that redesigned workflows before deployment showing significant measurable benefits.
The Uncomfortable Middle — What the Transition Actually Costs
• The transition to the Industrial Revolution was marked by the Luddite uprisings, where textile workers destroyed machinery due to desperation about their skills being made obsolete. This event highlights the gap between disappearing jobs and new, yet-to-be-invented ones. • The current AI transition is expected to replace many jobs, with computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton predicting significant capabilities in 2026. AI systems are rapidly completing tasks that previously took longer, with a recent MIT analysis finding they can handle nearly 12% of tasks tied to the US labor market. • Entry-level white-collar roles are being affected first by AI, with tasks such as drafting, research, and analysis being handled by machines, potentially hollowing out junior positions that once performed these tasks.
AI Is Making Tasks Faster. It Isn't Making Companies Richer.
• American companies are expected to spend $675 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, a 63% increase from last year, but the financial returns on this investment are unclear. • Studies have shown that AI can make tasks faster and improve output quality, but this does not necessarily translate to increased company-level productivity. • Only a small percentage of companies, such as 21% of S&P 500 companies, can cite a measurable AI benefit, and many executives struggle to confidently measure AI return on investment.